Label # -vs- MX #
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 1:02 am
I've decided I real should make a new post rather than invade "Can any one tell me if any of these 78 Records are worth any..." by tinapetre.
Having reviewed http://www.78discography.com/ (thanks Joe) I'm finding that the Label # on many of the Victor records that I have is also the same as the MX # embossed on the record, i.e.
Victor - Funiculi Funicula - Label #16899-A / Embossed # 16899A
Victor - Stars and Stripes Forever MArch - Label # 18092-A / Embossed # 18092-A
etc., etc.
although the Embossed #'s are preceded by a small # and small letter...
Is this - "just the way it was done" for those particular records; or, have I stumbled on a quirk of fate . . . ???
Also, would it be worth the time to list the records I have acquired somewhere here on this site?
Having reviewed http://www.78discography.com/ (thanks Joe) I'm finding that the Label # on many of the Victor records that I have is also the same as the MX # embossed on the record, i.e.
Victor - Funiculi Funicula - Label #16899-A / Embossed # 16899A
Victor - Stars and Stripes Forever MArch - Label # 18092-A / Embossed # 18092-A
etc., etc.
although the Embossed #'s are preceded by a small # and small letter...
Is this - "just the way it was done" for those particular records; or, have I stumbled on a quirk of fate . . . ???
Also, would it be worth the time to list the records I have acquired somewhere here on this site?