by Record-changer »
Fri Jul 18, 2008 8:00 am
It is interesting that Garrard did not mention that this would take record sizes in an arranged intermix (larger records under smaller records).
Magnavox and Webster-Chicago also didn't mention arranged intermix with their early arranged-intermix models. It is mentioned in the Magnavox manuals from the 1970s, where it says records of different size must be stacked in "pyramid fashion".