Crosley Record Player Reviews

Electrically amplified phonographs or radio/phonographs and related components (approx. 1928-1990).



Ron Rich
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8193
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 11:31 pm
Location: Millbrae (San Francisco area)CA, USA

Re: Crosley Record Player Reviews

by Ron Rich » Sat Sep 07, 2013 6:09 pm

Nope-Matt--"In my day", there were no chisels----
Ron Rich


Bobby Basham
Senior Member
Posts: 498
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA

Re: Crosley Record Player Reviews

by Bobby Basham » Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:41 am

Ron may have graduated from Moses High like I did...I think we were using clay tablets...lot less laborious and easier on the pocket book during the school year. --BB


Ron Rich
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8193
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 11:31 pm
Location: Millbrae (San Francisco area)CA, USA

Re: Crosley Record Player Reviews

by Ron Rich » Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:09 pm

Bobby,
You got it wrong, my friend ! I pre-date that by about 100k years !! :lol: Ron Rich


Thom
Senior Member
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 3:24 am
Location: Lancaster County Pa. USA

Re: Crosley Record Player Reviews

by Thom » Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:25 am

My kids were always fond of asking me "Dad? Were you sad when the dinosaurs died?"
Vinyl is disease which attacks that area of the brain desiring digital recordings. Once you catch it, you are cured.


Ron Rich
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8193
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 11:31 pm
Location: Millbrae (San Francisco area)CA, USA

Re: Crosley Record Player Reviews

by Ron Rich » Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:42 am

Thom,
Then I guess your kids are old now too ??? Ron Rich

User avatar

MattTech
Senior Member
Posts: 1461
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:38 am
Location: Philadelphia Pa USA - Home Electronics - Service Technician

Re: Crosley Record Player Reviews

by MattTech » Sat Sep 14, 2013 1:34 am

Why am I now inclined to think this soon will erupt into a.....
"I'm so old that......???" thread.
The Internet is a marvelous thing, however it's not a good substitute for actually being there.


Ron Rich
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8193
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 11:31 pm
Location: Millbrae (San Francisco area)CA, USA

Re: Crosley Record Player Reviews

by Ron Rich » Sat Sep 14, 2013 1:46 am

Cause you are "so old", that you recall this happening before ??
Ron Rich


vaguy2222
Regular Member
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2013 12:04 am
Location: suffolk va. USA

Re: Crosley Record Player Reviews

by vaguy2222 » Sat Sep 28, 2013 9:15 pm

Pilot made some very high Quality suitcase record players. Garrard 121 turntable, Magnetic Cart. transformer tube amp. HEAVY but good sound. Restore properly one of these and you are good for 20 years or more.


Radiotvnut
Junior Member
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:18 pm
Location: Meridian, MS

Re: Crosley Record Player Reviews

by Radiotvnut » Tue Jan 28, 2014 9:31 am

I'm the one who made the youtube video on how junky the "crosley" and other current phonographs are.

Concerning Califone record players, I like their older products; but, their later stuff does not impress me much (this is especially true of their current phonograph offering that looks like a rebadged Crosley).

When I was in elementary school during the '80's, we had some older Califone model 1410 and 1440 tube type record players, in addition to the blue and brown cased 1430K solid state models with the light on the tonearm. By the time I made it to jr. high school, there were some newer grey cased 1430K's and 1430C's. In the music room of my middle school, there was a Califone stereo model.

Over the years, I've worked on a good many idler driven Califone school record players and I generally like the older ones better. Sometime in the late '80's-early '90's, they stopped using the standard shaded pole AC motor in favor of a cheap DC motor. I've worked on a couple of mid-to-late '90's Califone model 1010AV record players that used this motor and on both of them, the cheap little motor was on it's way out. Had it not been for the cheap motor, they might have been decent machines. Of course, Califone does not offer parts support for older models and a new motor was NLA. On one of these units, I yanked out the newer drive mechanism and replaced it with an older AC motor driven mechanism.

The current Califone phonograph offering, the 1005, looks like a pile of crap. From what I've read about it, this model contains no headphone jack, uses a single needle for all speeds, and does not even have corner protectors on the cabinet.

I guess my favorite school phonographs are the tube Newcomb models from the '60's and '70's. These are built like tanks and generally sound very good. I also like the older Audiotronics models, except for the later ones with plastic tonearms. I'm not too crazy about the early solid state school record players because many of them use germanium transistors that have their own built-in "waterfall effect". In today's world, those old germanium transistors are getting unstable and new ones are often difficult to find or expensive.


Bobby Basham
Senior Member
Posts: 498
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA

Re: Crosley Record Player Reviews

by Bobby Basham » Sun Feb 02, 2014 4:24 am

I also like the older Newcomb, Audiotronics, VM stuff. I have one of those older classroom tube record players with the single 12A7(?) tube. Small oval speaker in the front, but when you put your ear up close to it, the "fidelity" was amazing. And it seems like that headphone jack was tapped right off the speaker...no padding down of the output so it could probably be used for an extension speaker.

Some of these thrift stores have back rooms and "bone yards" where stuff is just piled up and doesn't sell well. Ask to take a look-see back there and you may be surpised at what you find. --BB

Bobby Basham
Tucson, Arizona

Rheem-Califone and Audiotronics.jpg
Classroom tape recorder and phono - FREE!
Rheem-Califone and Audiotronics.jpg (89.18 KiB) Viewed 1013 times

Zenith-01A.jpg
Stereo Portable w/ detachable speakers $20.00
Zenith-01A.jpg (81.44 KiB) Viewed 1013 times

Webcor Stereo Recorder.jpg
SELF-CONTAINED TUBE MODEL - ONLY $3.98
Webcor Stereo Recorder.jpg (3.1 KiB) Viewed 1013 times


Radiotvnut
Junior Member
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:18 pm
Location: Meridian, MS

Re: Crosley Record Player Reviews

by Radiotvnut » Sun Feb 02, 2014 5:09 am

Most of the classroom record players had the headphone jack wired across the speaker with no padding. That was so that an external speaker or listening station with individual volume controls could be used. I'd like to find one of those Audiotronics models with the single 6T9 tube, as well as a Rheem-Califone record player (1410, 1430, 1440) from the late '60's-early '70's.

User avatar

Record-changer
Senior Member
Posts: 1139
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:11 pm
Location: Bloomington IN USA

Re: Crosley Record Player Reviews

by Record-changer » Mon Mar 24, 2014 6:01 am

If it really ran way too fast, you might have gotten one intended for use in Europe, where the line frequency is 50 Hz. Running that on 60 Hz would make it 20% fast.
http://midimagic.sgc-hosting.com

Daylight-stupid time uses more gasoline.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

It is currently Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:06 am