Packard Bell RPC-39

Electrically amplified phonographs or radio/phonographs and related components (approx. 1928-1990).



Topic author
SpokaneMan
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 7:32 pm

Packard Bell RPC-39

by SpokaneMan » Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:02 pm

I recently purchased a PB RPC-39 with a Garrard AT6 turntable. I'm having some trouble with playing albums.

Specifically, the unit came with what I believe to be the original cartridge, a Sonotone 22T (ceramic, I believe) and a needle (I have purchased a new needle, as well). When I place the stylus on the album it does not produce sound, and it also seems to be resting too much on the stylus, so much so that the front edge of the clip on the tone arm for the cartridge is scraping along the album. I believe the balance needs to be adjusted, but I'm not entirely sure how to do that and wanted to ask folks' opinions before messing with it. I have no real experience with older phonographs (except, of course, from when I was a kid and they were new!). Any ideas you might have would be most appreciated! I am posting the one photo I have of the unit, but can take more detailed pics of the arm, cartridge, etc., if that would be helpful.

THANK YOU!
Attachments
Packard Bell RPC-39.jpg
Packard Bell RPC-39.jpg (112.52 KiB) Viewed 1588 times


Ron Rich
Forum Moderator
Posts: 8195
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 11:31 pm
Location: Millbrae (San Francisco area)CA, USA

Re: Packard Bell RPC-39

by Ron Rich » Fri Dec 23, 2011 12:15 am

More detailed photos should help greatly !
Ron Rich


Topic author
SpokaneMan
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 7:32 pm

Re: Packard Bell RPC-39

by SpokaneMan » Mon Dec 26, 2011 10:20 pm

Here are several views I took close up. You'll see how the head of the arm, with the cartridge is resting solidly on the album, scraping along it. Also, even if I tried to manually hold it up some so just the needle is in contact I don't get any sound coming out, although I can tell that the unit is picking up my hand movements on the tone arm itself. Again, I apologize, I have no idea what I'm doing and do not know all the proper names for the various parts. Thanks again!
Attachments
IMG_1959.JPG
Another view
(658.5 KiB) Not downloaded yet
IMG_1951.JPG
Not sure what this part of the tone arm is called, but you do... :-)
(556.81 KiB) Not downloaded yet
IMG_1954.JPG
Another angle of the tone arm resting on the album
(629.92 KiB) Not downloaded yet
IMG_1952.JPG
This is how the tone arm is resting on the album. You can see how the front clip for the cartridge is resting solidly on the album.
(752.51 KiB) Not downloaded yet
IMG_1948.JPG
The needle in the cartridge
(780.23 KiB) Not downloaded yet
IMG_1947.JPG
The needle that was in the cartridge when I purchased the unit. I purchased a new needle, but no better result.
(959.33 KiB) Not downloaded yet
IMG_1945.JPG
The cartridge
(790.85 KiB) Not downloaded yet

User avatar

MattTech
Senior Member
Posts: 1461
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:38 am
Location: Philadelphia Pa USA - Home Electronics - Service Technician

Re: Packard Bell RPC-39

by MattTech » Mon Dec 26, 2011 10:31 pm

That cartridge is SHOT - the elements and yoke are missing, gone, history.
Someone messed with it.

See Gary Stork at http://www.thevoiceofmusic.com for a replacement.
Observe WHICH color wire connects to each pin - 4 wires - you don't want to get them mixed up.
Left - hot wire / Right - hot wire / Left - ground / Right - ground.

His EV5595-D is a good replacement - comes with mounting bracket and should perform like the original.
The Internet is a marvelous thing, however it's not a good substitute for actually being there.


Topic author
SpokaneMan
Junior Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 7:32 pm

Re: Packard Bell RPC-39

by SpokaneMan » Mon Dec 26, 2011 10:47 pm

Wow, thank you! I will look into it and report the results. I really appreciate you sharing your expertise.


curtrod58
Junior Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2012 10:41 pm

Re: Packard Bell RPC-39

by curtrod58 » Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:18 pm

We just picked up one of these in similar shape. Can someone tell what year(s) these were made? My son and I are newbies.

Thanks, Curt

User avatar

MattTech
Senior Member
Posts: 1461
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:38 am
Location: Philadelphia Pa USA - Home Electronics - Service Technician

Re: Packard Bell RPC-39

by MattTech » Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:24 am

curtrod58 wrote:We just picked up one of these in similar shape. Can someone tell what year(s) these were made? My son and I are newbies.

Thanks, Curt


Mid sixties.
The Internet is a marvelous thing, however it's not a good substitute for actually being there.

User avatar

Record-changer
Senior Member
Posts: 1139
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:11 pm
Location: Bloomington IN USA

Re: Packard Bell RPC-39

by Record-changer » Fri Jan 06, 2012 6:41 am

That is a Garrard AT-5.

The cartridge innards may have broken out during moving or shipping if the arm was not secured.

The stylus force needs to be checked whenever a new cartridge is installed in a spring balanced arm.
http://midimagic.sgc-hosting.com

Daylight-stupid time uses more gasoline.

User avatar

Record-changer
Senior Member
Posts: 1139
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:11 pm
Location: Bloomington IN USA

Re: Packard Bell RPC-39

by Record-changer » Fri Jan 06, 2012 6:49 am

Attachments

IMG_1959.JPG
This is the tone arm setdown position adjustment, so the stylus lands on the lead in groove of the record.

IMG_1951.JPG
This is the tonearm raising height adjustment.

There is another adjustment you did not photograph that is the stylus force adjustment. It is either at the back end of the white part of the arm pivot, or under the whit part.

Adjust the stylus force for the middle of the range specified on the cartridge.

Do NOT unscrew the tonearm horizontal bearing. You will have a very difficult time putting it back together again against the spring pressure.
http://midimagic.sgc-hosting.com

Daylight-stupid time uses more gasoline.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

It is currently Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:40 pm