by Ron Rich »
Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:21 pm
Rob, and all,
A word or two about Seeburg's ( and I would imagine, other companies) fusing practices.
They would submit new designs to UL for "approval" with minimum fusing. In most cases, UL would require additional fusing, but somehow the "tube type Tormat system" (which contained these un-fused amps) got through with no others required. Seeburg's main concern, was cost--both for the fuse, and any obligation that they may incur in warranty costs ( the 5 amp "pigtail" added to the ground circuit was to protect the Tormat against burn-up during the warranty period).
Their thinking on fuses usually was to use the maximum size fuse possible, as they did not want fuses "blowing for no reason".
I had more than one "dis-agreement" with the "Production Foreman", over very small cost items that were, IMHO, necessary to assure quality. In one instance, we argued for days over what he admitted "cost less than 1/8 th cent per jukebox". Since he was way above me in "pecking order", I enlisted a couple of QA engineers help, and won that one --but I lost several others.
He was a great guy, but he was strictly a "bean counter". I used to call him "Mr. C."--for Mr. "Counter"--but since his last name began with a C, there was never any problems--he never knew--
Ron Rich